I run paid media across Google, Meta and Microsoft, and I build and run AI workflows for marketing and the work around it: reports, enquiries, content, campaign production, outreach and voice agents, SEO and AI search visibility, and custom tools. Both start with something small and defined, and both are written down before any work starts.
Paid media starts with a fixed first step, priced on its page. AI implementation starts with a written scope, and the build and running it are quoted separately, because there is no honest standard price for a workflow nobody has seen yet. Either way, the scope, price and end point are written down before any work starts. No lock-in, and no retainer required to get started.
Paid media prices are on its page, plus GST.Both are open. Paid media has its prices on its page. AI implementation is quoted after a written scope.
I find where the ad spend is leaking, check the conversion tracking it bids on, then either run the account or advise the people who do.
I scope, build and run one recurring workflow at a time: a marketing report, enquiry handling, content, an outreach or voice agent, or search and AI visibility. A person reviews the output wherever it matters.
Every piece of work comes with a fixed price, a one-page terms of engagement and an invoice from Digiital Pty Ltd. The first message is where I check fit, not where I pitch.
A fixed-price audit of one ad account, or a diagnostic in the first week of management.
Best for / finding the problem firstMonthly management or advisory, with a written review each month and 30 days' notice either way.
Best for / an account that needs an ownerOne AI workflow scoped, built and then run each month, with a person reviewing its output.
Best for / recurring work that slows you downNot sure which one fits? Tell me the problem.
Start a working note →